City expressed huge outrage that the IC’s pending decision to charge was leaked two days early – which was indeed embarrassing to Uefa – although the reality is that throughout the method , little or no detail has leaked. the very fact that the IC did charge City, though, made it self-evident that the hierarchy’s explanations, and whatever documentation they did provide, didn’t satisfy the IC that questions raised by the club’s own internal communications had been irrefutably answered.
The IC can reasonably have expected City to supply , for instance , the interior replies to Chumillas’s stunning emails, which perhaps would show he had been corrected, or that in context it might be shown that it had been simply, “irrefutably”, not the case that ADUG was funding the Etihad sponsorship. Instead, the IC clearly decided that the allegations had not been refuted, and sent them for determination by Uefa’s CFCB adjudicatory chamber, which is chaired by José Narciso da Cunha Rodrigues, a former general prosecutor in Portugal and judge at the ecu Court of Justice, and includes a number one British barrister, Charles Flint QC.
These public responses after the fees were laid were according to the second element exposed by the emails: how hostile and confrontational City had been to Uefa, and to FFP itself, throughout the method of compliance – sometimes distastefully so. FFP applied to all or any top-flight clubs across Europe competing within the Champions and Europa Leagues, seeking to encourage long-term football development and dampen player wage inflation, with detailed new regulations and a classy reporting system developed by Uefa with blue-chip accountants. https://www.maxbetsbobet.org agen maxbet terbaik
City’s chairman, Khaldoon al-Mubarak, was never a serious supporter of FFP, seeing it as a restraint of Mansour’s freedom to rebuild City by pouring money in, but the emails showed the resistance went further. It seemed as if the hierarchy had almost taken it personally, feeling that this whole FFP system was a protectionist move to prevent Mansour’s extravagance challenging the established superclubs. Perhaps there was something of that within the support for FFP given by Bayern Munich and therefore the German clubs especially , but they were trying to take care of financial sustainability within the Bundesliga where most clubs are still ultimately controlled by supporters. They and lots of other clubs in Europe felt it had been alien to the game’s traditions for Gulf sovereign investors to shop for clubs and spend their thanks to success.
City perceived their plans for rapid accession to the Champions League elite were challenged by FFP, and persistently threatened a legal challenge. The club’s inhouse lawyer Simon Cliff wrote in one among the published emails that Mubarak had told Gianni Infantino, then Uefa’s general secretary, that he wouldn’t accept a financial sanction for exceeding the permitted €45m loss in 2012 and 2013, and said: “He would rather spend 30 million on the 50 best lawyers within the world to sue [Uefa] for subsequent 10 years.”
Hamza Choudhury was shown a second yellow card for his challenge on Leander Dendoncker. “What was the previous law about offside? There was an expression . . .